Peer Review Process
Mimbar Kekristenan maintains the standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process. All research articles published in the Mimbar Kekristenan undergo full peer review, the key characteristics of which are listed below:
- At least two suitably qualified experts review all research articles.
- The journal's Editors-in-Chief make all publication decisions based on the reviews provided.
- Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice, and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and assist in decision-making on specific submissions.
- Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows the Mimbar Kekristenan to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and editors alike.
- Mimbar Kekristenan additionally benefits through the manuscript referral process from the high-quality peer review conducted by established journals.
Peer review of referred papers:
Editors of Mimbar Kekristenan will decide promptly whether to accept, reject or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.
Peer review of novel submissions:
Articles submitted directly to Mimbar Kekristenan will be fully peer-reviewed by at least two appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.
Editors will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.
